Saturday, November 16, 2019
Motivation Through Acknowledgement Essay Example for Free
Motivation Through Acknowledgement Essay Impact of being a charismatic leader Leadership is about the ability to influence people by personal attributes and behaviours; different leadership qualities may be needed in different circumstances. Charismatic leadership: A charismatic leader is a leader whose followers are attracted to his or her personality and charm. People using this leadership style excel at working a room and making others feel that they are truly important and needed for the leader (and the cause) to be successful. These magnetic leaders do this through actions such as: Direct eye contact Remembering personal details about the person they are speaking with e. g. use of name or enquiry after family/social matters Giving their complete focus to the other person for the time they are with them Reading their surroundings and being skilled at detecting the moods of the audience and Adjusting his or her behaviours and speech to suit the situation at hand. Their approach when leading teams is to have their enthusiasm rubs off on their team members by being extremely positive and energetic. Teams do, however, need more than just a charming leader to keep them sustainable over the long term. Impacts of Charismatic Leadership Selling The Vision: These leaders are often exceptional at selling the vision and getting people to come along for the ride. They are geniuses at helping people to see possibilities and potentials to buy into something bigger than themselves. They are generally masters at weaving stories and anecdotes that enable people to buy into a big dream e.g. JFK leading a nation to put the first man on the moon Inspiring: Their generally optimistic and positive nature draws people to them like a moth to a flame. Often these leaders do inspire people to be at their best and the work environments they create can be very motivating to employees and colleagues alike. Drive Results. A highly charismatic leader can have people willing to walk over hot coals for him or her. Because of this they can achieve results and often get things done that other leadership styles may not. Think Hitler, Lee Iacocca Charismatic leadership is certainly a dynamic and empowering form of leadership, and combined with other styles of leadership, it creates a powerful force that gives people the enthusiasm andà self-management to achieve great results. A leader is a person who has a vision, a drive and a commitment to achieve that vision, and the skills to make it happen. A leader is a person who influences a group of people towards the achievement of a goal.
Thursday, November 14, 2019
e e cummings :: Biographies Poet Poetry Biography Essays
e e cummings à à à à à e e cummings (no, this is not a typographical error, take note to the way he writes his name) was an unusual, yet highly acclaimed writer of the 20th century. His style of writing was much different than that of any other contemporary or even 18th and 19th century writers. Although difficult to understand at times, e e cummings is a very profound and inventive writer. à à à à à e e cummings was born Edward Estlin Cummings on October 14, 1894 in Cambridge Massachusetts. His parents were Edward and Rebecca Haswell Clarke Cummings. In 1911, at the age of 17, cummings entered Harvard University. It was there at Harvard where he first published his poetry in 1912 in Harvard Monthly. Then, in 1915, cummings graduated Harvard as Magna cum Laude with a B.A. It was at his graduation where he gave his commencement speech, "The New Art." In 1916, cummings received an M.A. for English and Classical Studies at Harvard. After completing his college education, he volunteered to be an ambulance driver with Norton Harjes Ambulance Corps (The American Red Cross) in France in 1917, during World War I. It was while he was overseas when he was imprisoned falsely for three months in a camp on suspicion of French disloyalty. Although this was an unpleasant time in his life, it was there in the camp that changed his life. He was already an excellent writer, but this experience added fuel to his ability. He was released from prison on January 1, 1918. Cummings then returned to New York City, but was drafted by the United States Army in 1918 until Armistice. On December 20, 1919, e e cummings and his girlfriend, Elaine Orr Thayer, welcomed their daughter, Nancy, into the world. Later, on March 19, 1924 cummings married long-time girlfriend Elaine Orr, but they are divorce just a short while later on December 4, 1924. In 1920, after his time in the war and the birth of his daughter, cummings decided to move to Paris, France to study art, but he frequently returned home for visits to the United States. He remained living there only until 1923, when he returned to the US and had his aforementioned wedding and divorce later the next year. While in the US, cummings resided at 4 Patchin Place, Greenwich Village in New York City. In 1925, tragedy struck cummings' life when his father died.
Monday, November 11, 2019
Tax Memo
Facts Latrell accumulated frequent flyer miles from his business travel as a CPA in which his employer paid for the business trips, and he was not taxed on the travel reimbursement. He recently used his Delta Skymiles to purchase a free roundtrip airline ticket worth $1,200 to Milan, Italy. Issues Is an employeeââ¬â¢s personal use of frequent flyer miles earned as a result of business travel taxable? Authorities IRC Sec. 62(a) IRS Announcement 2002-18 ConclusionNo, an employeeââ¬â¢s personal use of frequent flyer miles earned as a result of business travel is not taxable. Because Latrellââ¬â¢s used his frequent flyer miles to purchase an airline ticket instead of redeeming his frequent flyer miles for cash, he does not need to include the value of the airline ticket in gross income. Analysis IRC Sec. 62(a) provides the deductions from gross income that are allowed for computing ââ¬Å"adjusted gross income. â⬠IRC Sec. 2(a)(1) states that gross income includes fringe be nefits such as frequent flyer miles accumulated from business travel. IRC Sec. 62(a)(2)(A) states that the reimbursed expenses of an employee related to his or her performance of services under a reimbursement or other expenses allowance arrangement with the employer are allowable deductions in addition to those allowed by IRC Sec. 161 through IRC Sec. 196. Since under IRC Sec. 62(a) frequent flyer miles are categorized as deductions to gross income, they are not taxable.IRS Announcement 2002-18 also states that frequent flyer miles or other in-kind promotional benefits, such as a free airline ticket, earned by the taxpayerââ¬â¢s business travel will not represent taxable income. However, this ruling applies only to in-kind benefits and not to benefits that have been liquidated or converted to cash. Therefore, since Latrell used his frequent flyer miles to purchase an airline ticket instead of redeeming his frequent flyer miles for cash, he does not need to include the value of t he airline ticket as taxable income.
Saturday, November 9, 2019
Belonging Essay Essay
Concept, perceptions and ideas to belong or not to belong differ from person to person. This is due to experiences that shape ones personality that come through personal, cultural, social and historical context. The idea of belonging allows one to have some sort of connection and communal with people, places, groups, communities and the wider world. In contrast not belonging causes one to suffer from alienation, exclusion and marginalisation. As a result these factors can cause an individual to be at different states of depression depending on oneââ¬â¢s personality and situation. However in society, belonging has become and essential to life. Many texts have explored the notion of belonging and not belonging; the play Rainbows End by Jane Harrison and the short film Between the Flags Produced by Jayce White explore the concept of belonging and not belonging to place and people through several forms. Rainbows End by Jane Harrison is a play that explores the concept of belonging and not belonging thorough Harrisonââ¬â¢s choice of cultural and historical context at the time. The play is set in the 1950ââ¬â¢s during the time Queen Elizabeth II was visiting Australia and whilst many racist policies where practiced such as the Assimilation, Paternalistic and the White Australia policy which all discriminated and alienated the Aboriginal people from the wider community. Throughout the play, it is manifest the Aboriginal people belong and do not belong to certain placed and people. This is shown through a conversation that Nan Dear his with Dolly about her birthplace, ââ¬Å"Well, of course Iââ¬â¢m not gunna die. Not here anyway. Gotta go back to my old place to do that. Nan Dear Act One Scene One. This quote conveys Nan Dearââ¬â¢s idea of belonging to place, she assertively expresses to dolly that this is not her place and she will eventually return to where she fits most, through this may not be physically but rather spiritually, which is also part of the aboriginal culture and traditions. The understanding to belong, not belong and the longing to belong alters from one individual to another, this is extensively due to oneââ¬â¢s overall background experiences which have ultimately shaped ones thoughts and ideas on the various notions of belonging. This is very evident throughout the play, Rainbows End as different perceptions of belonging are conveyed through conversations and incidents that occurs from characters of different social and historical background. An example of such is the conversation that Errol and Dolly have about the differences in their families. Errol attempts to convince Dolly that he is willing to give her a better life, if she agrees to marry him but away from her family. Dolly does not agree with Errol Fisherââ¬â¢s views on a better life and continues to question his thoughts through the repetition of his words. DOLLY: You want me to leave here for ever? ERROL: Iââ¬â¢m offering you a better life. DOLLY: A better life? ERROL: In the city thereââ¬â¢s department stores so big that you can spend all day in them. Why in the city thereââ¬â¢s even little restaurants you can eat spaghetti, just like Italy. DOLLY: Spaghetti? This conversation portrayed Errol and Dollyââ¬â¢s different perceptions of belonging. The use of the repetition is ironic as Dolly has her family and place does not understand the meaning of ââ¬Å"better lifeâ⬠. The connection that dolly has with her family and place has created her to feel comfortable there regardless of all the discriminatory acts of the time. Errol and Dollydiffering opinions come through their social and cultural context which causes them to continuously clash between each other. ââ¬Å"Your world. And youââ¬â¢re just assuming that your world is better. But actually, when I think about it- when I think about nasty Nancy ââ¬â she has everything that opens and shuts. Iââ¬â¢m not sure it isbetter. I wouldnââ¬â¢t trade placer with her for anything. And as far as youââ¬â¢re offering â⬠¦ no thank you. This is my place. Iââ¬â¢m staying right here with my Mum and Nanâ⬠despite Dolly not being a young adult who has subjected to racial incidents, that could be prevented in the future if she accepts to marryErrol The short film Between the Flags is a Tropfest film that references and represents the incident that had occurred in the year of 2005, Cronulla riots, concerning two racial groups; the Australian and the Lebanese, which caused violence and division amongst the two races. If mixing of the two diverse racial groups had occurred at the time it often resulted in a brawl and further conflict; however the filmBetween the Flags argues this conviction through a humorous way. Several forms such as: humour, irony, popular culture and themes such as the beach and ââ¬Å"typical Australian blokeâ⬠support the idea that two or more people can intertwine together regardless of any dispute one being removed from the external society. The use of irony is used throughout the complete film, it creates humour in-between the two characters which generates harmony amongst them, this is apparent in the film. An example of this is when the Lebanese character (character are not given names instead each represents an ethnicity which is shown through their choice of costume) approaches the Australian bloke: ââ¬Å"Whatââ¬â¢s goin onâ⬠ââ¬â Lebanese boy ââ¬Å"Gââ¬â¢day mateâ⬠ââ¬â Australian bloke ââ¬Å"Here for the riotsâ⬠ââ¬â Lebanese boy ââ¬Å"Yeah, looks like weââ¬â¢re the first ones hereâ⬠ââ¬â Australian bloke ââ¬Å"Maybe we should wait for a more peopleâ⬠ââ¬â Lebanese boyà The conversation between them continues the irony of the situation is the conversation that occurs, and also the use of such words such as ââ¬Å"mateâ⬠, as both of them are at the beach to riot against each other; instead they involve themselves together in a communal conversation. Throughout give-and-take of words between the two characters they both felt a sense belonging and ease towards each other even through the beach was supposed to be a place of non-belonging and dispute. This was majorly due to them being part of the popular culture and sharing the same interest. Their reactions were shown through the use of close up camera shots, as they enable the viewer to understand the characters emotions and have a sense of empathy towards them. The short film Between the Flags uses the beach as the setting to the film, as this is also references to the Cronulla riots as they had occurred at the beach. The attitudes that the characters have towards the beach affirm that it is a place of regular social call, also part of each ones character regardless of their ethnic background. Two characters connection with the beach enables the viewers to have an immediate understanding that it is a place of belonging to one another. This is manifest in the film through the connection that the characters grow due to playing a game of cricket, nevertheless in the film the beginning of the game the Lebanese character says ââ¬Å"umm I donââ¬â¢t usually do this butâ⬠¦Ã¢â¬ this had displayed to the audience that he is not too liking of cricket but he starts to play as it is most appropriate to do so. This was shown through a continuous full camera shot to show the characters interaction with each ther and to also display the setting of the film. Throughout exploring and analysing texts it has become most evident that people views of belonging is constructed through their perception on the place. This concept was explored in the two texts Rainbows End by Jane Harrison and the short film Between the Flags produced by Jayce White as both texts had explored belonging, not belonging or the longing to belong to a place through the perceptions and the social, historical, cultural and personal context of an individual determined their sense of belonging and not belonging.
Thursday, November 7, 2019
Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals Essays
Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals Essays Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals Paper Did Gladstone Unite or Divide the Liberals Paper Gladstone was undoubtedly the leading Liberal politician of his era. He supported free trade and, under his leadership, his governments passed many significant reforms, which abolished privilege and moved Britain towards a meritocracy. He did not, however, always represent the views of his Liberal supporters. As a High Churchman and a supporter of the right of the aristocracy to govern, Gladstone led a party where many opposed the privileged position of both the Church of England and the aristocracy. It did not help that inside parliament, a rift grew between Whigs and Radicals, which led to the split of 1886. Outside parliament, the Party comprised a wide variety of competing groups, each in pursuit of its own political aims. Historians such as D. A Hamer in Liberal Politics in the Age of Gladstone and Rosebery (1974) and Martin Pugh in The Making of Modern British Politics (1982) have referred to the faddism within the Liberal Party in that the Party was susceptible to splits. Even before Gladstone had become Liberal leader, the Party split over the issue of parliamentary reform when Robert Lowe led the Adullamite faction against Gladstones electoral bill in 1866. From 1873 to 1886, the Liberal party was affected by division within its ranks. Eventually the party did split, over the issue of Irish Home Rule, into two factions: the Gladstonian Liberals and the Liberal Unionists. Gladstones main rival was Joseph Chamberlain, he had a radically different view of which policies the Liberal Party should follow. The disunity within the party and the split of 1886 had much to do with the issue of Irish Home Rule as well as the rivalry between Gladstone and Chamberlain. The Liberal party was often made up of many different often competing factions as well as holding Gladstones own political views. His own political views were sometimes in tune with the views of the majority of Liberal supporters but, at other times, were at odds with them. A central key to understanding Gladstones views is to realise that he was a deeply religious man who believed that his involvement in politics was related directly to his religious beliefs. Much of his stature as a politician was based on his ability to think of political problems as moral issues. His opposition to the Bulgarian Horrors, his opposition to Beaconsfieldism in 1879-80 and his campaigns on Irish issues all seemed like religious crusades. In practical terms Gladstone was a firm supporter of free trade for the whole of his life political life. Alongside this was his dislike of government interference in the lives of its citizens. As a result, Gladstone supported retrenchment thereby lowering taxation. This was combined with a constant drive to improve the efficiency of government and other national institutions. The basis of Gladstones view of the minimalist state was the importance of the individual. Gladstone did not see society as a set of competing economic classes, but rather of individuals where each should have the opportunity to fulfil their potential. As he stated, I will always back the masses against the classes. This did not mean he that he was a democrat or even by the norms of the time, a social conservative. In 1878 he said I am an out-and-out inequalitarian. He believed in rule by those individuals in society who had a tradition of service to the state and possessed sufficient wealth to be above the charge of possible corruption. He was therefore a supporter of the traditional roles of monarchy and aristocracy. Gladstone became Prime Minister in December 1868, his first cabinet reflected the diverse composition of the Liberal Party. It contained three former Peelites (Gladstone, Cardwell and De Grey), with three Liberals (Childers, Goschen and Bruce) and two Radicals (Lowe and Bright. ) However the largest group were the Whigs who held seven posts including Foreign Secretary. The main principles of Gladstonian Liberalism were clearly present in the reforms passed. Support for free trade, administrative efficiency in government, retrenchment and individual self-expression are all apparent in many of the reforms. Many contemporaries saw the ministry as one that was engaged in an attack on privilege to create a meritocracy. However, many of his reforms were aimed at satisfying the political demands of pressure groups associated with the Liberal party such as Educational reform (National Education League) and trade union reform (New Model Unions). With regard to Irish reform Gladstone used the slogan Justice for Ireland as his major rallying cry during the 1868 general election to unify the disparate elements of the Liberal party. The disestablishment of the Church of Ireland Act in 1869 did possess major features to please Liberal supporters. The Liberation Society, which wished to disestablish the Church of England, saw Irish disestablishment as a first step towards their ultimate goal. Liberals, in general, also saw the act as removing an obvious Irish grievance. However, many Whigs viewed this attack on the Irish Establishment with deep suspicion and the later Irish Land Act was seen as a an attack on the rights of property and helped push them towards the Conservative Party. The reforms in the Army contained many of the principles underpinning Gladstonian Liberalism: the improvement of efficiency, an attack on privilege and the enhancement of individual self-expression. In an attack on privilege, the most controversial aspect of army reforms was the abolition of the purchase of commissions. In future, promotion within the officer class was to be based on merit only. This was met by fierce opposition in the House of Lords that it was introduced by Royal Warrant and not act of parliament in July 1871. Another area of controversy was the decision to withdraw British troops from the self-governing colonies, in particular Canada and New Zealand. Gladstone believed these colonies would only be truly self-governing if they looked after their own defence. This decision created opposition in Canada, who feared a US invasion. Disraeli, the Conservative leader, even went so far as to claim that this proposal was part of a Gladstonian plot to dismember the Empire. As a politician who had been involved in the formative stages of the Liberal Party, Gladstone possessed considerable support within the party. In addition, to the middle class supporters of liberalism within the electorate Gladstones name was directly linked to the achievement of free trade and the economic boom with which it was associated. From the mid 1860s he also became associated with the extension of the right to vote to skilled workers. Gladstone did realise, perhaps more than any other politician, the diverse nature of the Liberal party and its capacity to split into competing groups. Between 1859 and 1895 each Liberal Administration had fallen from power because of internal divisions. To hold the different aspects of the Liberal Party together, Gladstone believed that a single issue, which contained clearly Liberal principles, should be used to force unity on the party at election times. In 1868, Gladstone used the rallying cry of Justice for Ireland, in 1874, Abolition of Income Tax, in 1880 Anti-Beaconsfield (opposition to Conservative foreign policy) and in 1886 and 1892 Irish Home Rule. It is true that Gladstone did lead the party to stunning victories in 1868 and 1880. Yet in 1886 his decision to support Irish Home Rule did split the party in two, thus even though Gladstone did try to unite the Party, inevitably he did end up dividing it. Unity was never restored, after 1895 the Conservatives and Liberal Unionists merged to become the Unionist Party. However, historians such as A. B Cooke and J. Vincent in The Governing Passion (1974) see the split on Home Rule as part of a deliberate act by Gladstone to reassert his control over the Liberal Party. By getting rid of Chamberlain, Gladstone was able to regain some amount of control. In his biography of Gladstone (1995), H Matthew stated that It is not difficult to see the latter part of Gladstones public life as a failure: religion on the wane, the free order giving way to militarism and protectionism, Britain bloated by imperial expansions, Home Rule unachieved, the Liberal Party divided. This is quite a harsh assessment of Gladstones career after 1868, during his time in power; instead he led governments, which destroyed the Anglican/landowning monopoly of political power. He passed a large number of reforms, which attacked privilege and helped establish a meritocracy. His cabinets were the first to contain nonconformists and in 1883 to 1886 he passed electoral reform which moved Britain closer towards manhood suffrage. However, Matthews claim that Gladstone divided the Liberal party does have some truth in it. Yet, as T. A Jenkins suggests in Gladstone, Whiggism and the Liberal Party (1988) Gladstones leadership may have split the Party in 1886 but it was also a major factor in holding the diverse elements of Liberalism together in the years 1868 to 1880. Gladstone deliberately balanced Whiggism and Radicalism, as shown in his choice of cabinet ministers in 1880. It could even be stated that without Gladstone the Liberal Party would not have stayed united for so long. Gladstone made quite an impact on the Liberal Party as E. J Feuchtwanger wrote in 1975 Gladstone was a towering figure in the Victorian age. The shape and the content of politics would have been quite different without him. Towards the end of his long public life there was a sense in which he had outlived himself, but the values he championed with such fervour have perennial validity. Therefore, it can be seen that although Gladstone did divide the Liberal party with the issue of Irish Home Rule, it was not his intention to do this. This is because he tried to unite the Liberal party with a common cause such as abolishing income tax. He led the Party to victories in 1868 and 1880 which show that he was successful in keeping the Liberals together. It is more to do with the diverse nature of the Liberal Party and the competing groups within it that caused the division. The policy of Irish Home Rule thus can be seen of as a turning point which caused the divide and not Gladstone himself. It must be stressed that although he did divide the Liberals, it would have been inevitable that the Liberal Party would have eventually split if Gladstone was in office or not.
Monday, November 4, 2019
Some commentators have argued that the credit crunch has resulted in a Essay
Some commentators have argued that the credit crunch has resulted in a shortage of funds being made available to small firms - Essay Example It entails changing ones course towards new things that are considered more creative in generating ones desires. Growth of medium and small businesses encompasses an increment from a low level of business to an advanced level, covering operations over a large scope. There is a wide variety of business forms depending on their size, management, as well as proprietorship; and ranging from public corporations, private companies to the smallest businesses that are singly owned. The operations of each form of a corporation may take several courses where some come together to operate as a group, while others remain singly operated (Smallbone, 2008). For successful enterprises operations, valuers and policy makers or even the proprietors always find it necessary to value companies according to the prevailing operations. Valuation is crucial for it assists the concerned parties in making appropriate decisions as well as laying the corporations on a scale, a factor that helps predict the futu re direction of the companies. More so, different techniques and approaches are employed in the companiesââ¬â¢ valuations, which are carried out depending on the form of the company at hand. Private company valuations are thus deemed very important in the day-to-day running of the corporations. There is a need for employment of different techniques in the valuation processes to enhance a comprehensive cover, since each technique yields distinct Results. This paper is aimed at investigating into the valuation of private companies and several valuation techniques in details. Additionally, it will be crucial to establish the advantages and disadvantages of the several methods herein discussed as well as the other alternative methods that could as well be used in the valuation processes in regard to private companies (Bridge, et al., 2003). Valuation of private companies Company valuation is a process that entails the utilization of a sequence of procedures in estimating its value. T his process is mainly carried out by valuators, who come up with a comprehensive report concerning the companyââ¬â¢s assets and liabilities. Financial participants in the market mainly use the valuation as a basis for price discussions when the company is on sale. Earlier research has not established a professional method or approach that provides an actual value of a particular company, but numerous approaches and techniques are considered important in determining the value of a company. The current available used techniques only provide an estimate of what the company is worth. Various factors are always considered when valuing a company depending on whether the company is privately owned or publicly owned. Valuation processes are carried out with a lot of caution, considering the companyââ¬â¢s assets quality, the nature of its liabilities as well as the intangible assets. It is beneficial to value a companyââ¬â¢s assets since it helps the investors in making sound decisi ons concerning their company. Additionally, it is often important in giving prospective buyers some confidence due to the full awareness of the
Saturday, November 2, 2019
Brainstorming Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words
Brainstorming - Assignment Example It may improve collaboration and increase the quantity of ideas, and it is designed so that all attendees participate and no ideas are rejected. The process begins with a well-defined topic. Each participant brainstorms individually, then all the ideas are merged onto one large idea map. During this phase, participants discover a common understanding of the issues as they share the meanings behind their ideas. (Google video) Identifying the problem at hand in the first place is a very bright idea for the group. By doing this, the group has a varied set of ideas they can generate in order to come up with the solution. The way also the group sits in a relaxed manner and informal way thus allowing free flow of ideas. During this sharing, new ideas may arise by the association, and they are added to the map as well. Once all the ideas are captured, the group can prioritize and take action. This is the idea the team seems to take to tackle the problem at hand. This way, the group comes up with the solution easily. (Google video) Brainstorming is surely the best way to solve problems and come up with new ideas. This is demonstrated by the virtue that Google video. Google uses this method steering it to great heights. The group also portrays great teamwork and this is a great motivation to the entire
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)